Elizabeth Coleman vs Ana Grubor Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does Grubor's recent second serve performance compare to Coleman's? Grubor has won 35.21% of points on their second serve, while Coleman leads with 45.95%. This statistic is crucial for predicting match outcomes.
• In recent return game effectiveness, Grubor has claimed 52.06% of opponent's second serve points, while Coleman's percentage is slightly higher at 57.14%. For first serve returns, Grubor is slightly better with 32.71% compared to Coleman's 31.34%.
• Under pressure, Grubor excels in saving breakpoints at 42.91% compared to Coleman's 28.57%, an important metric for in-game betting predictions.
• Grubor's annual match win rate is 45.65%, whereas Coleman has a more impressive 60%, giving Coleman a competitive edge overall.
• Both players have their highest win percentages on Clay, but Coleman's 60% surpasses Grubor's 46%. On the opposite end, Coleman has struggled on Indoor Hard courts with a 0% win rate, while Grubor has a 35% win rate on the same surface.
• Grubor has mostly competed in higher level Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.04% of such matches. In contrast, Coleman has a 100% win rate in the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K category.
• The quality of opposition faced shows a stark contrast; Grubor's average opponent rank is 335.57, while Coleman has faced tougher competition with an average opponent rank of 56.6.
• In deciding sets, Grubor has a mere 11% win rate in the past year, while Coleman has impressively won all deciding sets played.
• Grubor's breakpoint conversion rate is 38.24%, compared to Coleman's much higher rate of 71.43%, which is critical for in-game prediction when players have breakpoint opportunities.

Editorial Prediction (August 13, 2025, UTC):

As we assess the players' recent performances and statistical edges, Coleman undeniably shows a higher consistency in second serve points and an effective return game, crucial factors in determining match outcomes. Grubor, however, demonstrates resilience under pressure with a superior breakpoint save rate.

Yet, Coleman's remarkable 100% win rate in lower level tournaments and a significant advantage in breakpoint conversion hint at a decisive edge. Coleman's previous match stats also highlight heightened performance against more challenging opponents, making them battle-hardened for tougher contests.

Assessing both players' strength on clay courts indicates Coleman's suitability on this surface, yet an 0% win rate on Indoor Hard could be a vulnerability. The stark contrast in deciding set win ratios heavily favors Coleman, suggesting they maintain composure under intense match conditions.

Considering these performance trends and statistical analyses, Coleman is seemingly the more favorable candidate to secure victory in the upcoming match.